Anthropomorphics: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Anthropomorphics is an originary grammar of the center. It was first developed in a [https://www.amazon.com/Anthropomorphics-Originary-Grammar-Dennis-Bouvard/dp/0648690571 book] with the same title by Dennis Bouvard. Anthropomorphics starts with Generative Anthropology's derivation of successive speech forms developed by Eric Gans in the [https://www.amazon.com/Origin-Language-New-Eric-Gans-ebook/dp/B07N8H9GG6/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1RW61AQPR9S2U&keywords=origin+of+language&qid...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Anthropomorphics reveals that speaking in terms of the imperatives we are conveying, or hearing, from the center, when discussing [[declarative]] sentences and discourse, will yield insights unavailable when following more conventional imperatives to speak about sentences and discourses in terms of meanings packaged by one mind for others according to specific explicit and tacit rules. | Anthropomorphics reveals that speaking in terms of the imperatives we are conveying, or hearing, from the center, when discussing [[declarative]] sentences and discourse, will yield insights unavailable when following more conventional imperatives to speak about sentences and discourses in terms of meanings packaged by one mind for others according to specific explicit and tacit rules. | ||
Anthropomorphics has a small set of “invariants”: concepts like “center,” “origin,” “[[mimesis]],” “scene” and “[[deferral]],” organized around a hypothetical event founding humanity and which is then repeated, expanded and made complex is innumerable ways | |||
Revision as of 19:07, 17 April 2023
Anthropomorphics is an originary grammar of the center. It was first developed in a book with the same title by Dennis Bouvard. Anthropomorphics starts with Generative Anthropology's derivation of successive speech forms developed by Eric Gans in the Origin of Language but unlike Gans, more rigorously orients the vocabulary around the center.
Anthropomorphics reveals that speaking in terms of the imperatives we are conveying, or hearing, from the center, when discussing declarative sentences and discourse, will yield insights unavailable when following more conventional imperatives to speak about sentences and discourses in terms of meanings packaged by one mind for others according to specific explicit and tacit rules.
Anthropomorphics has a small set of “invariants”: concepts like “center,” “origin,” “mimesis,” “scene” and “deferral,” organized around a hypothetical event founding humanity and which is then repeated, expanded and made complex is innumerable ways
