Centered Ordinality: Difference between revisions

From Generative Anthropology
(Created page with "“Eric Gans had seen the originary event as one in which all members of the group issued the first sign (the aborted gesture of appropriation) simultaneously. It seemed to me that this couldn’t be the case, and that if the crisis leading up to the emission of the sign was mimetically driven, the same must be the case, in reverse, so to speak, for the issuing of the sign. Someone, then, must have put forth the gesture (a kind of hesitation) first, with others subsequen...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
“Eric Gans had seen the originary event as one in which all members of the group issued the first [[sign]] (the aborted gesture of appropriation) simultaneously. It seemed to me that this couldn’t be the case, and that if the crisis leading up to the emission of the sign was mimetically driven, the same must be the case, in reverse, so to speak, for the issuing of the sign. Someone, then, must have put forth the gesture (a kind of hesitation) first, with others subsequently imitating that sign. So, if there’s a first, there’s also a second, and a third, and so on. This establishment of a sequential order then, it seemed to me, must be taken as the model for human activity as such, and “centered ordinality” seemed to express that directly.”
Eric Gans sees the Originary Event as one in which all members of the group issued the first [[sign]] (the aborted gesture of appropriation) simultaneously. Katz suggests that this couldn’t be the case, and that if the crisis leading up to the emission of the sign was mimetically driven, the same must be the case, in reverse, so to speak, for the issuing of the sign. Someone, then, must have put forth the gesture (a kind of hesitation) first, with others subsequently imitating that sign. So, if there’s a first, there’s also a second, and a third, and so on. This establishment of a sequential order then must be taken as the model for human activity as such, and “centered ordinality” seemed to express that directly.”


Excerpt From
Excerpt From

Revision as of 04:24, 14 March 2023

Eric Gans sees the Originary Event as one in which all members of the group issued the first sign (the aborted gesture of appropriation) simultaneously. Katz suggests that this couldn’t be the case, and that if the crisis leading up to the emission of the sign was mimetically driven, the same must be the case, in reverse, so to speak, for the issuing of the sign. Someone, then, must have put forth the gesture (a kind of hesitation) first, with others subsequently imitating that sign. So, if there’s a first, there’s also a second, and a third, and so on. This establishment of a sequential order then must be taken as the model for human activity as such, and “centered ordinality” seemed to express that directly.”

Excerpt From

Anthropomorphics: An Originary Grammar of the Center

Dennis Bouvard