Big Man: Difference between revisions

From Generative Anthropology
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:GA Basics]]
[[Category:GA Basics]]
[[Category:Generative Anthropology]]
[[Category:Generative Anthropology]]
"This is a term I borrow from Eric Gans who, in his The End of Culture, borrows it from the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins. It is important for generative anthropology because it marks the moment at which the sacred [[center]], which was at first occupied only by the sacred object itself (presumably the totemic and appetitive object of the group), comes to be occupied by a human. This moment marks the beginning of explicit and “legitimated” inequality between humans.
The '''Big Man''' refers to the first human occupation of the [[center]]. Previously, the center had only been occupied by totemic and appetitive objects.  


Excerpt From
== Origin ==
Before the emergence of the Big Man, distributions from the center were roughly equal, and not proportional to one's contribution towards the community. This led to increasing [[resentment]], as members of the group felt they were not receiving their "fair share." Eventually, this resentment led to another crisis, which was defused by the emergence of the Big Man by placing a human at the center to manage distributions.


Anthropomorphics: An Originary Grammar of the Center
This moment marks the beginning of explicit and “legitimated” inequality between humans (namely, the Big Man and the rest of the community).


Dennis Bouvard
== Additional Information ==
Eric Gans borrows this term from the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins.

Latest revision as of 14:12, 13 May 2023

The Big Man refers to the first human occupation of the center. Previously, the center had only been occupied by totemic and appetitive objects.

Origin

Before the emergence of the Big Man, distributions from the center were roughly equal, and not proportional to one's contribution towards the community. This led to increasing resentment, as members of the group felt they were not receiving their "fair share." Eventually, this resentment led to another crisis, which was defused by the emergence of the Big Man by placing a human at the center to manage distributions.

This moment marks the beginning of explicit and “legitimated” inequality between humans (namely, the Big Man and the rest of the community).

Additional Information

Eric Gans borrows this term from the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins.