Imperative: Difference between revisions

From Generative Anthropology
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
[[Category:Generative Anthropology]]
[[Category:Generative Anthropology]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
An '''imperative''' is a command derived from an [[Ostensive]]: An action is often warranted when an Ostensive is issue, for example when someone issues the Ostensive “fire!!!”, it’ll imply the Imperative that you should either seek shelter or help put out the fire. An Imperative can also be more explicit like “Pass the salt”, and like the Ostensive, the Imperative is also derived from something currently present at the Scene.
An '''imperative''' is a command derived from a misplaced [[ostensive]]: an ostensive used in absence of its referent.


=== References ===
== Examples ==
''Gans, E. L., Katz, A. L. (2019). The Origin of Language: A New Edition''
 
* "Run!"
* "[Give me the] Scalpel!"
 
== Development ==
The first imperative was derived from a misplaced ostensive. However, imperative could not have been issued as a result of the speaker "wanting the hearer to supply him with the object", because this presupposes the availability of the imperative. Instead, the misplaced ostensive can be explained by what participants in a [[sign]] community desire above all: to maintain linguistic presence.
 
In an ostensive language, the only means of maintaining linguistic presence is through the ostensive, which can only be issued when its referent is present on the [[scene]]. In the case of the first imperative, the speaker issues an ostensive in absence of its referent object, with the desire to actualize linguistic presence, to which the hearer, who can only interpret this as the speaker expressing his desire for the object, responds by supplying the speaker with the object. In this scenario, the ostensive language becomes an imperative language, and, within this new language, the hearer's refusal to comply with the imperative can only be understood as a refusal of linguistic presence. Thus, in imperative languages, performance is the only satisfactory response to the imperative.
 
== Intentional Structure and Characteristics ==
The intentional structure of the imperative is a verbal request which establishes an awaiting of performance by its hearer, compliance with which abolishes the awaiting and terminates the prolonged presence that it maintained.
 
== References ==
Gans, E. L., Katz, A. L. (2019). ''The Origin of Language: A New Edition''
 
Katz, A. (2020). ''Anthropomorphics.''

Revision as of 05:28, 14 March 2023

An imperative is a command derived from a misplaced ostensive: an ostensive used in absence of its referent.

Examples

  • "Run!"
  • "[Give me the] Scalpel!"

Development

The first imperative was derived from a misplaced ostensive. However, imperative could not have been issued as a result of the speaker "wanting the hearer to supply him with the object", because this presupposes the availability of the imperative. Instead, the misplaced ostensive can be explained by what participants in a sign community desire above all: to maintain linguistic presence.

In an ostensive language, the only means of maintaining linguistic presence is through the ostensive, which can only be issued when its referent is present on the scene. In the case of the first imperative, the speaker issues an ostensive in absence of its referent object, with the desire to actualize linguistic presence, to which the hearer, who can only interpret this as the speaker expressing his desire for the object, responds by supplying the speaker with the object. In this scenario, the ostensive language becomes an imperative language, and, within this new language, the hearer's refusal to comply with the imperative can only be understood as a refusal of linguistic presence. Thus, in imperative languages, performance is the only satisfactory response to the imperative.

Intentional Structure and Characteristics

The intentional structure of the imperative is a verbal request which establishes an awaiting of performance by its hearer, compliance with which abolishes the awaiting and terminates the prolonged presence that it maintained.

References

Gans, E. L., Katz, A. L. (2019). The Origin of Language: A New Edition

Katz, A. (2020). Anthropomorphics.